Computer-Implemented Inventions: Ideas That Are Fundamental Truths And Generically Implemented Are Not Patent Eligible By Charles W. Shifley In a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Thomas on June 19,
On June 18, 2014, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruled in Blackhorse v. Pro Football, Inc., that six federal registrations for trademarks that include the term “Redskins” must be
The American Bar Association has invited Richard S. Stockton to discuss intellectual property rights and copyrights with the U.S. Department of State’s International Visitor Leadership Program. This selective program focuses
U.S. Supreme Court Says Induced Infringement Requires Direct Infringement, But Leaves Direct Infringement Standard to Federal Circuit By H. Wayne Porter In a decision dated June 2, 2014, in the
U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Definiteness Standard By Paul M. Rivard Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc. involving the definiteness requirement of
Federal court rules in favor of Banner & Witcoff client NIKE, Inc., in “Fuel” trademark dispute
Steve S. Chang discusses the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Limelight v. Akamai in Law360
Aseet Patel discusses how to quickly file high-quality patent applications in Law360
John P. Iwanicki discusses cancer drug patent dispute in Chemical & Engineering News
Supreme Court Allows Copyright Action, Holds No Laches Defense By Ernest V. Linek Yesterday, in Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. (No. 12-1315), the Supreme Court ruled that the doctrine of laches
