Charles W. Shifley discusses the importance of the Federal Circuit’s decisions in In re: Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC and Pacing Technologies LLC v. Garmin International Inc. in the Law360 article, “5 Recent Fed. Circ. Rulings IP Attys Need to Know.” Please click here to read the article.
Robert F. Altherr Jr., Ross A. Dannenberg, Frederic M. Meeker, Chunhsi Andy Mu, Joseph M. Potenza, Benjamin C. Spehlmann and Bradley C. Wright were named to the 2015 Washington, D.C. Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists for their work in intellectual property law. The Super Lawyers lists represent the top 5 percent of attorneys in each state. These…
Robert F. Altherr Jr., Ross A. Dannenberg, Frederic M. Meeker, Chunhsi Andy Mu, Joseph M. Potenza, Benjamin C. Spehlmann and Bradley C. Wright were named to the 2015 Washington, D.C. Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists for their work in intellectual property law. The Super Lawyers lists represent the top 5 percent of attorneys in each state. These…
On April 14, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sua sponteordered an en banc hearing on whether the Supreme Court’s 2012 decision in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., should cause the appeals court to “overrule Jazz Photo Corp. . . . to the extent it ruled that a sale of a patented item outside the United…
Michelle K. Lee, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, visited Chicago on April 16 to discuss current developments and topics in patent law and policy. Banner & Witcoff shareholder Richard S. Stockton played a key role in organizing the program, which included a roundtable discussion between…
H. Wayne Porter discusses several ways post-grant reviews differ from other types of contested patent proceedings in his article, “The Role of Post-Grant Reviews in Patent Challenges Before the PTAB.” Please click here to read the article.
Steve S. Chang discusses the issues and outcomes in lawsuits filed by former collegiate athletes in the article, “Face Value: Where’s My NCAA Football Game?” in the March/April 2015 issue of Landslide magazine. Please click here to read the article.
SUPREME COURT MARKS TTAB DECISIONS AS HAVING PRECLUSIVE EFFECT By R. Gregory Israelsen On March 24, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States held in B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., that some decisions by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) may have a preclusive effect on judgments by federal district courts.…
In the March 2015 issue of Intellectual Property Today, Banner & Witcoff ranks as a “Top Patent Firm.” The firm also ranks No. 1 for design patents. Please click here for the complete list of rankings.
Helen Hill Minsker discusses the significance of the Supreme Court’s ruling in trademark case B&B Hardware Inc. v. Hargis Industries Inc. in Law360. Please click here to read the article, “Attorneys React to Supreme Court’s TTAB Preclusion Ruling.” A subscription is required.
XThis website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy. Read MoreCookie settingsRejectAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
This cookie is associated with Amazon Web Services and is used for managing sticky sessions across production servers.
JSESSIONID
Used by sites written in JSP. General-purpose platform session cookies that are used to maintain users' state across page requests.
viewed_cookie_policy
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitors, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gid
This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information on how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the website is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages visited in an anonymous form.