U.S. Supreme Court Says Induced Infringement Requires Direct Infringement, But Leaves Direct Infringement Standard to Federal Circuit By H. Wayne Porter In a decision dated June 2, 2014, in the
U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Definiteness Standard By Paul M. Rivard Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc. involving the definiteness requirement of
Federal court rules in favor of Banner & Witcoff client NIKE, Inc., in “Fuel” trademark dispute
Steve S. Chang discusses the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Limelight v. Akamai in Law360
Aseet Patel discusses how to quickly file high-quality patent applications in Law360
John P. Iwanicki discusses cancer drug patent dispute in Chemical & Engineering News
Supreme Court Allows Copyright Action, Holds No Laches Defense By Ernest V. Linek Yesterday, in Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. (No. 12-1315), the Supreme Court ruled that the doctrine of laches
Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., a national intellectual property law firm dedicated to the procurement, enforcement and litigation of intellectual property rights throughout the world, welcomes seven summer associates to the
John P. Iwanicki discusses the USPTO’s new patent eligibility guidelines in Nature Biotechnology
Twelve Banner & Witcoff Attorneys Recognized as 2014 MIP IP Stars
