Skip to main content

P Alert: Google Books Affirmed as Fair Use

NEWS -
GOOGLE BOOKS AFFIRMED AS FAIR USE By Steve S. Chang The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s finding that the Google Books project constitutes fair use, and is not an infringement of the copyrights in the millions of books contained in the project. The case is The Authors Guild…

LMG Life Sciences names John P. Iwanicki and Lisa M. Hemmendinger as 2015 “Life Science Stars”

NEWS -
LMG Life Sciences, an annual publication that provides a comprehensive analysis of the life sciences industry, names Lisa M. Hemmendinger and John P. Iwanicki as “Life Science Stars” in its 2015 edition. Ms. Hemmendinger and Mr. Iwanicki were recognized for their achievements in the intellectual property practice area. For more information on LMG Life Sciences and “Life Science Stars,” please click…

Banner & Witcoff wins summary judgment of no infringement for Mouldtec, Inc.

NEWS -
On Sept. 29, 2015, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of firm client, Mouldtec, Inc. The case, Mouldtec, Inc. v. Pagter & Partners International B.V., No. 1:12-cv-04249, involved U.S. Patent No. 6,581,330 (the ‘330 patent), a patent for packaging cut flowers owned by Pagter,…

Brian J. Emfinger discusses eight patent-ineligible concepts categorized as “an idea ‘of itself'” in a Law360 series

NEWS -
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, Int’l., Brian J. Emfinger discusses eight of the patent-ineligible concepts categorized as “an idea ‘of itself'” in Law360. The three-part series reviews the claims at issue in each case as well as the reasoning the courts employed to conclude that the claimed concepts were abstract…

Banner & Witcoff wins on summary judgment for Spanish baby care product client

NEWS -
On Sept. 30, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana granted Banner & Witcoff client Groupo Rimar, a/k/a Suavinex, SA’s motion for summary judgment and entered judgment in Suavinex’s favor. The federal court agreed that Suavinex had not breached its contract with Luv N’ Care Ltd., and that Luv N’ Care was…
Contact Banner Witcoff Share on LinkedIn View this page as a pdf Share on Twitter Email this page Print this page