Robert S. Katz, who participated in a conference on the Supreme Court’s arguments in Samsung v. Apple at American University School of Law, said that requiring patent owners to present expert testimony and consumer survey results to support charges that consumers bought the entire product because of the patented design is expensive and “breaks the system.”
Bloomberg BNA’s article, “Design Patent Community Rues Apple Stance at Supreme Court,” focuses on the discussion between Mr. Katz and other panelists following the Oct. 11 arguments.
Please click here to read the article. A subscription is required.
Posted: October 13, 2016
