Bradley C. Wright explains that Allergan’s transfer of patent rights to chronic dry eye medication Restasis to the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe in upstate New York could be seen as “highly
Darrell G. Mottley comments on opening law school admissions to GRE test takers in DC Bar News. In the article, “Law School Admissions: Is It Time to Drop the LSAT?”
Improvement or Selection Inventions: Cannot Assume Obviousness Elements By Sarah A. Kagan Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated a rejection for obviousness and remanded
Banner & Witcoff successfully defended firm client C&F Enterprises’ free speech rights in a trademark litigation against OBA Canvas Co. regarding OBA’s mark A MERMAID SLEEPS HERE in the U.S.
Benjamin Koopferstock analyzes the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Ultratec Inc. v. CaptionCall LLC, and how it may impact the Supreme Court’s upcoming decision involving inter partes review in Oil States
Technological Improvements, Illustrative Solutions, and Computer Code Appendix Shields Against a Motion to Dismiss on Alice Grounds By Aseet Patel and Brian J. Emfinger In Visual Memory LLC v. NVIDIA
On August 21, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a judgment of no infringement entered by the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada
Joseph J. Berghammer, V. Bryan Medlock Jr., Jon O. Nelson, Binal J. Patel, Joseph M. Potenza, Christopher J. Renk, Charles W. Shifley and Bradley C. Wright are listed as leaders in intellectual
Inter Partes Reviews – Who Can Get the Big Job Done By Charles W. Shifley Inter partes review (IPR) statistics are fascinating. As of June 30, 2017, and in the
Richard S. Stockton, the former national chair of the Saul Lefkowitz Moot Court Competition, comments on the importance of the annual competition for law students in a new International Trademark
