Skip to main content

Banner Witcoff Kicks Off 2026 Summer Associate Program

NEWS -
Banner Witcoff is pleased to launch its 2026 summer associate program this month by welcoming eight law students to its Chicago and Washington, D.C. offices.   The summer associate program is a key component of Banner Witcoff’s recruiting efforts. The firm offers law students the opportunity to work closely with attorneys, assist in diverse legal assignments, and participate…

Four Banner Witcoff Attorneys Named in WIPR Leaders 2026

NEWS -
Banner Witcoff is proud to announce that four of our attorneys earned recognition in the 2026 edition of WIPR Leaders, published by the World Intellectual Property Review (WIPR). The guide is dedicated to identifying the world’s leading lawyers in patents, trademarks, and trade secrets. The following attorneys have been named to the 2026 edition of…

PTAB Highlights | Takeaways from Recent Decisions in Post-Issuance Proceedings

NEWS -
By Kyler Kappes and Elizabeth Yang So, what’s happening at the PTAB?  Functional language, establishing priority, adding new annotations in Reply, and more! Heads I win, tails you lose—argue functional language both ways. Samsung Elecs. Co. v. Harbor Island Dynamic, LLC, IPR2024-01404, Paper 32 (Mar. 11, 2026) (Jung, joined by Anderson and Peslak). Because Petitioner’s anticipation…

IP Alert | USPTO’s Updated Guidelines for Graphical User Interface and Screen Designs

NEWS -
By Robert S. Katz and Sonia M. Okolie The USPTO will soon be issuing updated guidelines for applicants and examiners for design patent applications directed to computer-generated interfaces (e.g. GUIs) and icons. The incoming Guidelines change course from the prior Supplemental Guidance issued in November 2023, which was later incorporated into the Manual of Patent…

PTAB Highlights | Takeaways from Recent Decisions in Post-Issuance Proceedings

NEWS -
By Craig Kronenthal and Elizabeth Yang So, what’s happening at the PTAB?  Privy and RPI issues, explaining inconsistent claim constructions, the particularity requirement, and more! 2 degrees of separation from Petitioner – not a privy.  Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC v. Greenthread, LLC, IPR2024-00264, Paper 78 (February 78, 2026) (Praiss, joined by Obermann and Belisle) The…

IP Alert | Range of Motion v. Armaid: Is the “Plainly Dissimilar” Assessment Plainly Distending?

NEWS -
By Richard Stockton, Principal Shareholder “Plain dissimilarity,” the U.S. design law assessment that enables judges to decide design patent infringement issues before trial based on allegedly clear visual differences between claimed designs and accused products, continues to gather steam following a new Federal Circuit opinion. But one judge thinks plain dissimilarity has gone too far.…
Contact Banner Witcoff Share on LinkedIn View this page as a pdf Share on Twitter Email this page Print this page