Skip to main content

Ernest V. Linek presents “Protecting Intellectual Property” at the Massachusetts Bar Association’s Program “Advising the Entrepreneur”

EVENT -
Advising the Entrepreneur Do you have a client starting his/her own business? This program will educate attendees on what issues an entrepreneur might face during the business formation process. Learn from experienced startup, tax, and IP-focused lawyers as they draw upon experiences and share tips to build out the practitioner’s “tool kit” for advising entrepreneurial…

Banner Witcoff Represents NIKE in Two More IPR Wins Over adidas

NEWS -
On February 19, 2019, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) ruled in favor of NIKE in a pair of inter partes reviews, holding that adidas failed to carry its burden of proving the challenged patents invalid.  The NIKE patents-at-issue relate to innovations in NIKE’s Flyknit business. adidas filed its petitions in April 2016.  After…

Patent Ownership Disputes

NEWS -
Brad Van Pelt outlines the biggest risks for companies working with outside consultants during product development and why patent ownership disputes can make or break consumer product launches, in the Journal of the Patent & Trademark Office Society. Click here to read the article.

Banner Witcoff is Top Firm in Docket Navigator Patent Litigation Report

NEWS -
With the patent litigation changes that occurred at the Supreme Court level in 2018, Docket Navigator executed a year in review that resulted in their annual Patent Litigation Special Report. The report recognizes Banner Witcoff as a Top PTAB Firm by Number of Proceedings and Top Patentee Firm. In addition, Banner Witcoff attorney Bradley C. Wright is…

Craig W. Kronenthal comments on the PTAB’s intent to follow the USPTO’s new patent eligibility framework in Law360.

NEWS -
Craig W. Kronenthal discusses a recent decision that involved a patent application from Ford Global Technologies LLC on a method for facilitating software updates in a vehicle’s computer system. The examiner had found various claims were directed to the abstract idea “of updating software.” “The examiner has not determined that the claims recite an abstract…

Athena v. Mayo: Are pure diagnostic claims per se ineligible for patenting?

NEWS -
Athena v. Mayo: Are pure diagnostic claims per se ineligible for patenting? By Sarah A. Kagan The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Athena Diagnostics, Inc., v. Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC, (2017-2508) on February 6, 2019. The court held diagnostic method claims subject-matter ineligible, unless they embody a separate…
Contact Banner Witcoff Share on LinkedIn View this page as a pdf Share on Twitter Email this page Print this page