Category: NEWS

TTAB APPEAL AT USDC – WIN OR LOSE – YOU PAY THE USPTO COSTS By Ernest V. Linek On April 23, 2015, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled (2-1)

On April 27, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled once again in Biosig Instruments Inc. v. Nautilus Inc. that a Biosig heart rate monitor patent asserted

Marc S. Cooperman, Dale H. Hoscheit, V. Bryan Medlock Jr., Jon O. Nelson, Joseph M. Potenza and Charles W. Shifley were named to Euromoney’s 2015 Expert Guide to the “World’s Leading

Charles W. Shifley discusses the importance of the Federal Circuit’s decisions in In re: Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC and Pacing Technologies LLC v. Garmin International Inc. in the Law360 article,

Robert F. Altherr Jr., Ross A. Dannenberg, Frederic M. Meeker, Chunhsi Andy Mu, Joseph M. Potenza, Benjamin C. Spehlmann and Bradley C. Wright were named to the 2015 Washington, D.C. Super Lawyers

Robert F. Altherr Jr., Ross A. Dannenberg, Frederic M. Meeker, Chunhsi Andy Mu, Joseph M. Potenza, Benjamin C. Spehlmann and Bradley C. Wright were named to the 2015 Washington, D.C. Super Lawyers

On April 14, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sua sponteordered an en banc hearing on whether the Supreme Court’s 2012 decision in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., should cause

Michelle K. Lee, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, visited Chicago on April 16 to discuss current developments and topics

H. Wayne Porter discusses several ways post-grant reviews differ from other types of contested patent proceedings in his article, “The Role of Post-Grant Reviews in Patent Challenges Before the PTAB.”

Steve S. Chang discusses the issues and outcomes in lawsuits filed by former collegiate athletes in the article, “Face Value: Where’s My NCAA Football Game?” in the March/April 2015 issue of Landslide