Skip to main content

Banner & Witcoff, three attorneys receive top rankings in the 2018 World Trademark Review 1000

NEWS -
Banner & Witcoff is recognized as a top firm in the 2018 edition of the World Trademark Review 1000, a standalone publication that recommends leading individual practitioners and their firms in the trademark field in more than 70 global jurisdictions. Helen Hill Minsker, Christopher J. Renk and Richard S. Stockton also received top individual rankings in the 2018 edition. According to World…

IP Alert: Did the Supreme Court Bless Claims to Methods of Treating?

NEWS -
  Did the Supreme Court Bless Claims to Methods of Treating? By Sarah A. Kagan At the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit oral argument in Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals (Case Nos. 16-2707 and 16-2708) on Dec. 5, Judge Lourie challenged each side to defend its position on the subject-matter eligibility…

Robert S. Katz and Alisa S. Abbott write chapter on protecting and enforcing design rights in the United States for Designs: A Global Guide 2018

NEWS -
Robert S. Katz and Alisa S. Abbott examine protecting and enforcing design rights in the United States in their chapter in Designs: A Global Guide 2018. The guide, published by World Trademark Review, offers practitioners a reference guide to design rights in 15 jurisdictions, including the United States. Click here to read their chapter.

IP Alert: Supreme Court Continues its Analysis of the AIA in SAS v. Matal

NEWS -
  Supreme Court Continues its Analysis of the AIA in SAS v. Matal By Katie L. Becker On November 27, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in SAS Institute, Inc. v. Joseph Matal. Although SAS seems to have taken a back seat to Oil States,[1] the outcome of SAS could heavily impact petitioners, patent…

IP Alert: Supreme Court Considers Constitutionality of Inter Partes Review in Oil States

NEWS -
  Supreme Court Considers Constitutionality of Inter Partes Review in Oil States By Benjamin Koopferstock On November 27, 2017, the Supreme Court heard argument in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC[1], to answer whether inter partes review (IPR) violates the Constitution by “extinguishing private property rights through a non-Article III forum…
Contact Banner Witcoff Share on LinkedIn View this page as a pdf Share on Twitter Email this page Print this page