Technological Improvements, Illustrative Solutions, and Computer Code Appendix Shields Against a Motion to Dismiss on Alice Grounds By Aseet Patel and Brian J. Emfinger In Visual Memory LLC v. NVIDIA
On August 21, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a judgment of no infringement entered by the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada
Joseph J. Berghammer, V. Bryan Medlock Jr., Jon O. Nelson, Binal J. Patel, Joseph M. Potenza, Christopher J. Renk, Charles W. Shifley and Bradley C. Wright are listed as leaders in intellectual
Inter Partes Reviews – Who Can Get the Big Job Done By Charles W. Shifley Inter partes review (IPR) statistics are fascinating. As of June 30, 2017, and in the
Richard S. Stockton, the former national chair of the Saul Lefkowitz Moot Court Competition, comments on the importance of the annual competition for law students in a new International Trademark
Joseph M. Skerpon was featured as a “Legal Lion” for his successful representation of Honeywell International Inc., in, “Law360’s Weekly Verdict: Legal Lions & Lambs.” On August 1, the Federal Circuit vacated a Patent Trial and
Darrell G. Mottley, the chair of the D.C. Bar Global Legal Practice Task Force and former D.C. Bar president, comments on the task force’s recommendation to amend D.C. Court of
Banner & Witcoff was recognized by Managing Intellectual Property for filing 44 inter partes review petitions on behalf of client Comcast Corp. in the first half of 2017. This was the most IPR petitions
Joseph J. Berghammer discusses why client YETI Coolers’ Rambler tumblers are distinctive and should be protectable in the Bloomberg BNA article, “Yeti Enforces Trade Dress Over Rambler Cups as IPO
Banner & Witcoff was recognized by Law360 for representing client NIKE, Inc., in inter partes review brought by Skechers USA against seven of NIKE’s patents covering sneaker designs. The PTAB rejected Skechers’ request
