Charles W. Shifley evaluates the arguments of patent owners and challengers involved in inter partes review in World Intellectual Property Review. Please click here to read his article, “IPR: histrionics
SCA Hygiene: Mountain or Mole Hill? That is the Question By Ernest V. Linek The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby
Darrell G. Mottley, who attended the Supreme Court’s arguments in Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands, discusses the justices’ take on camouflage and how it compares to the design of cheerleading
Banner & Witcoff received a National Tier 1 ranking in intellectual property litigation, patent litigation and patent law in the 2017 edition of U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers’
Mr. Stockton discusses the difficulty the Supreme Court justices had in defining a test to establish the article of manufacture in Samsung v. Apple in Managing Intellectual Property. He says
Mr. Stockton was featured in the IPO Daily News for representing the Intellectual Property Owners Association at the 36th Session of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Standing Committee on the Law
John P. Iwanicki and Ernest V. Linek were named 2016 Massachusetts Super Lawyers for their work in intellectual property law. Super Lawyers’ lists represent the top 5 percent of attorneys in
Mr. Chang discusses his experience at the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Samsung v. Apple on Oct. 11, in EE Times. In his article, he says Steve Jobs made an
Robert S. Katz, who participated in a conference on the Supreme Court’s arguments in Samsung v. Apple at American University School of Law, said that requiring patent owners to present
Steve S. Chang, who attended the Supreme Court’s arguments in Samsung v. Apple on Oct. 11, discussed the justices’ potential interest in setting a new standard for design patent damages in Law360 and
