Bradley J. Van Pelt and Alisa S. Abbott examine two recent cases that have provided clarity on the consequences related to filing multiple embodiments in a design application, and the
Aaron Bowling and R. Gregory Israelsen are recognized in the 2018 Managing Intellectual Property “IP Stars” list of “Rising Stars.” Each year IP Stars research analysts receive and analyze information
Robert S. Katz, the chair of the International Trademark Association’s Designs Committee, discusses how INTA’s new Guidelines for Examination of Industrial Designs will allow the association to better harmonize and
EU Court Finds There’s No Accounting for Taste in Copyright Lawsuit By Liz Brodzinski The Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union issued its ruling
Anna King, who presented “Getting Your IP Into Shape” to the Chartered Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys in August in Bristol, England, is featured in the December 2018/January 2019 edition
Helsinn v. Teva at the Supreme Court: Did the America Invents Act Change the On-Sale Bar? By Sarah A. Kagan The U.S. Supreme Court entertained very lively oral arguments
Banner Witcoff, Ltd. welcomed two new associates and a technical specialist in the second half of 2018.
Paul M. Rivard discusses the potential for Supreme Court justices to focus more on the text of the patent statute than its historical context during arguments in Helsinn Healthcare v. Teva
Audra C. Eidem Heinze discusses the importance of patents to slot machine makers and which patents could face challenges in the Bloomberg article, “Slot-Machine Fight to Determine Which Companies Hit the
Allergan v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA: Will the Recognized Commercial Success of Restasis® Demonstrate Non-Obviousness? By Sarah A. Kagan At the November 6, 2018, oral arguments at the U.S. Court
