Banner Witcoff

Justices Set to Rule on Test for Patent Indefiniteness By Paul M. Rivard On April 28, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc. involving the statutory requirement in 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph for distinct patent claiming. The patent at issue relates to a heart rate monitor…

Five Banner & Witcoff Attorneys are Named Washington, D.C. Super Lawyers

IP Alert: U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in ABC v. Aereo

Ross A. Dannenberg discusses upcoming Supreme Court arguments in ABC v. Aereo in Law360

Chunhsi Andy Mu named to Diversity & the Bar's "Who Made Partner in 2013?"

IP Alert: Supreme Court Justice Characterizes Alice v. CLS Bank as Being on the Idea of "Solvency," or "Computer, Stop;" While All Justices Search Among King Tut, Scylla, Charybdis and Archimedes for Inspiration

On March 27, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio held that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., which addressed the “first sale” doctrine under copyright law, does not extend to the “first sale” doctrine under patent law as applied to patented articles first sold outside…

BTI Consulting Group, a leading provider of strategic research to the legal services industry, reports that corporate counsel rank Banner & Witcoff in the top 25 percent of law firms with the best client relationships.   In its BTI Client Relationship Scorecard 2014, BTI asked more than 500 corporate counsel at Fortune 1000 and large…

Christopher L. McKee discusses the Idle Free decision in Law360

Banner & Witcoff clients Skype Technologies and RTX Telecom win inter partes reexaminations