John P. Iwanicki discusses how the Supreme Court will approach the question of whether a single genetic testing kit component is sufficient to meet the test of a “substantial portion” of a potentially infringing
Steve S. Chang evaluates the Supreme Court’s decision in Samsung v. Apple in the article, “SCOTUS Apple v. Samsung Ruling, Just the FAQs.” In a nutshell, he says, the Supreme Court
Another Bite at the Apple…Maybe? Supreme Court Reverses and Remands to the Federal Circuit By Steve Chang and Richard Stockton Less than two months after oral argument, the U.S. Supreme
Banner & Witcoff congratulates client ReThink LLC for its recent appearance on ABC’s “Shark Tank.” Trisha Prabhu, a 16-year-old innovator, social entrepreneur and advocate from Naperville, Ill., invented ReThink as
Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., a national intellectual property law firm that procures, enforces and litigates intellectual property rights throughout the world, welcomes four new associates who were sworn in during
Charles W. Shifley evaluates the arguments of patent owners and challengers involved in inter partes review in World Intellectual Property Review. Please click here to read his article, “IPR: histrionics
Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., a national intellectual property law firm that procures, enforces and litigates intellectual property rights throughout the world, welcomes five lateral associates. Luke S. Curran, Chicago, focuses
SCA Hygiene: Mountain or Mole Hill? That is the Question By Ernest V. Linek The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby
Darrell G. Mottley, who attended the Supreme Court’s arguments in Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands, discusses the justices’ take on camouflage and how it compares to the design of cheerleading
Banner & Witcoff received a National Tier 1 ranking in intellectual property litigation, patent litigation and patent law in the 2017 edition of U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers’
